<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Macworld Expo Boston: The First &amp; Last</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeremiahlee.com/blog/2004/07/15/macworld-boston/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeremiahlee.com/blog/2004/07/15/macworld-boston/</link>
	<description>Jeremiah on gay geek technocracy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 03:52:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finlay</title>
		<link>http://jeremiahlee.com/blog/2004/07/15/macworld-boston/comment-page-1/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>Finlay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2004 22:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremiahlee.com/blog/2004/07/15/macworld-boston/#comment-262</guid>
		<description>Why do you blame IDG for this? I have it on good authority that high-ranking Apple executives were involved with the negotiations right up until the last minute, and gave IDG their support for the move. IDG went ahead and signed a deal with the Boston guys, and made the PR. Somewhere in there, someone told Steve Job about it - it made good business sense (vendors were already pulling out of NY expo because of the high costs associated with it), etc - and he just put his foot down and said &quot;no&quot;, because he &quot;likes New York&quot;.

When Apple issued their PR saying they weren&#039;t going to attend, IDG were as flabbergasted as anyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you blame IDG for this? I have it on good authority that high-ranking Apple executives were involved with the negotiations right up until the last minute, and gave IDG their support for the move. IDG went ahead and signed a deal with the Boston guys, and made the PR. Somewhere in there, someone told Steve Job about it &#8211; it made good business sense (vendors were already pulling out of NY expo because of the high costs associated with it), etc &#8211; and he just put his foot down and said &#8220;no&#8221;, because he &#8220;likes New York&#8221;.</p>
<p>When Apple issued their PR saying they weren&#8217;t going to attend, IDG were as flabbergasted as anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah</title>
		<link>http://jeremiahlee.com/blog/2004/07/15/macworld-boston/comment-page-1/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2004 16:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremiahlee.com/blog/2004/07/15/macworld-boston/#comment-256</guid>
		<description>I plan to cancel my .Mac subscription when it comes up for renewal. I won&#039;t switch to anything. I have an iPod, so I don&#039;t use online storage. I have too many e-mail accounts. I don&#039;t need virus protection in Mac OS X. I use a free, open-source backup application. My web server has WebDAV enabled to share iCal files. I use a free, open-source, insanely powerful but easy to use WordPress for blogging. No one needs .Mac or SpyMac Wheel if they have even the crappiest of hosting companies. A standard web hosting account is more versatile than either of these services and most certainly cheaper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I plan to cancel my .Mac subscription when it comes up for renewal. I won&#8217;t switch to anything. I have an iPod, so I don&#8217;t use online storage. I have too many e-mail accounts. I don&#8217;t need virus protection in Mac OS X. I use a free, open-source backup application. My web server has WebDAV enabled to share iCal files. I use a free, open-source, insanely powerful but easy to use WordPress for blogging. No one needs .Mac or SpyMac Wheel if they have even the crappiest of hosting companies. A standard web hosting account is more versatile than either of these services and most certainly cheaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

